| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 895 | |
| 890. |  | ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN. G.; JORGE, J.; ROEL, A.; PARFITT, J.; GIGENA, M.; GIGENA, F. Intensificación sostenible mediante rotaciones arroz-soja-pasturas/ganadería regadas por aspersión en lomadas del este de Uruguay. Resumen zafras 2019-2020 y 2020-2021 y conclusiones. In: Terra, J. A.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H.; Mesones, B. (Eds.) Arroz 2021. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2022. p. 29-32. (INIA Serie Técnica; 262)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 891. | | ZORRILLA, G. Riego de arroz por aspersión Buscando alternativas para la cadena agroindustrial arrocera y agrícola ganadera del este. Revista Arroz (ACA). 2019, v. 19, no. 100. p. 34-37.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 892. | | ZORRILLA, G.; JORGE, J.; ROEL, A.; PARFITT, J. BARBAT; GIGENA, M.; GIGENA, F. Intensificación sostenible mediante rotaciones Arroz-Soja-Pasturas / Ganadería regadas por aspersión en lomadas del Este en Uruguay. Resultados zafra 2019-2020. In: Terra, J. A.; Martínez, S.; Saravia, H.; Mesones, B.; Álvarez, O. (Eds.) Arroz 2020. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2020. p. 81-84. (INIA Serie Técnica; 257)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 895 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
10/02/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
|
Autor : |
BRITO, L.F; BERRY, D.; LARROQUE, H.; SCHENKEI, F.S.; CIAPPESONI, G.; O’BRIEN, A.; TORTEREAU, F.; UGARTE, E.; PALHIERE, I.; BAPST, B.; JAKOBSEN, J.; ANTONAKOS, G.; KOMINAKIS, A.; CLEMENT, V.; BRUNI, G.; LOYWYCK, V.; MASSENDER, E.; OLIVEIRA, H.R.; POSTA, J.; ASTRUC, J.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
L.F. BRITO, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada; D. BERRY; H. LARROQUE, INRAE, Toulouse, France; F.S. SCHENKEL, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada; CARLOS GABRIEL CIAPPESONI SCARONE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. O’BRIEN, TEAGASC, Fermoy, Ireland; F. TORTEREAU, INRAE, Toulouse, France; E. UGARTE, 5NEIKER, Vizcaya, Spain; I. PALHIERE, INRAE, Toulouse, France; B. BAPST, Qualitas AG, Zug, Switzerland; J. JAKOBSEN, NSG, Norway; G. ANTONAKOS, Frizarta, Agrinio, Greece; A. KOMINAKIS, Frizarta, Agrinio, Greece; V. CLEMENT, IDELE, Toulouse, France; G. BRUNI, ARAL, Crema, Italy; V. LOYWYCK, IDELE, Toulouse, France,; E. MASSENDER, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada; H.R. OLIVEIRA, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada; J. POSTA, ARAL, Crema, Italy; J.M. ASTRUC, IDELE, Toulouse, France. |
|
Título : |
Genetic evaluation systems and breeding programs in sheep and goats: an international perspective. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, 17., No. 26, 2020. Virtual Meeting 1-4 December, 2020. DOI: DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-900-8. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 560 |
|
DOI : |
10.3920/978-90-8686-900-8. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Genetic selection has been a key tool for improving productive performance in small ruminant populations around the world, especially in Europe. This has been achieved through selective breeding for numerous traits, using diverse genetic evaluation systems and breeding schemes. Knowledge of the alternative approaches taken is paramount to the design of efficient and integrated genomic breeding programs. In this study, we summarised information on 48 sheep and goat breeding programs, genetic and genomic evaluation systems and resources available in 12 countries involved in the SMARTER project. This was done using published reports and surveys distributed to all partners. Responses to the surveys reveals information for more than 9, 16, and 20 dairy goat, dairy sheep, and meat sheep breeds involved in genetic schemes, respectively, with ~3,083,562 animals included in data collection schemes. The main groups of traits recorded across countries are: (1) milk yield and composition, mastitis indicators, udder and
body conformation, and reproduction in dairy sheep and dairy goats; and (2) growth, reproduction, health, ultrasound, wool, and carcass in meat sheep. Seven countries have progeny testing schemes, but only 5 use artificial insemination. There are numerous challenges to be addressed (e.g. disparity of trait recording, SNP panels, statistical models used, joining pedigrees across countries as well as grouping breeds based on genetic similarity, and an average of ~30% of animals with unknown sires). However, there are many opportunities to use the current resources and develop collaborative approaches to optimise selection for novel breeding goals such as resilience and efficiency in small ruminants across countries. MenosGenetic selection has been a key tool for improving productive performance in small ruminant populations around the world, especially in Europe. This has been achieved through selective breeding for numerous traits, using diverse genetic evaluation systems and breeding schemes. Knowledge of the alternative approaches taken is paramount to the design of efficient and integrated genomic breeding programs. In this study, we summarised information on 48 sheep and goat breeding programs, genetic and genomic evaluation systems and resources available in 12 countries involved in the SMARTER project. This was done using published reports and surveys distributed to all partners. Responses to the surveys reveals information for more than 9, 16, and 20 dairy goat, dairy sheep, and meat sheep breeds involved in genetic schemes, respectively, with ~3,083,562 animals included in data collection schemes. The main groups of traits recorded across countries are: (1) milk yield and composition, mastitis indicators, udder and
body conformation, and reproduction in dairy sheep and dairy goats; and (2) growth, reproduction, health, ultrasound, wool, and carcass in meat sheep. Seven countries have progeny testing schemes, but only 5 use artificial insemination. There are numerous challenges to be addressed (e.g. disparity of trait recording, SNP panels, statistical models used, joining pedigrees across countries as well as grouping breeds based on genetic similarity, and an average of ~30% of ani... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
OVINOS; SHEEP. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15000/1/Brito-et-al-EAAP2020.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02889nam a2200385 a 4500
001 1061719
005 2021-02-11
008 2020 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.3920/978-90-8686-900-8.$2DOI
100 1 $aBRITO, L.F
245 $aGenetic evaluation systems and breeding programs in sheep and goats$ban international perspective.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aAnnual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science, 17., No. 26, 2020. Virtual Meeting 1-4 December, 2020. DOI: DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-900-8.$c8686
300 $ap. 560
520 $aGenetic selection has been a key tool for improving productive performance in small ruminant populations around the world, especially in Europe. This has been achieved through selective breeding for numerous traits, using diverse genetic evaluation systems and breeding schemes. Knowledge of the alternative approaches taken is paramount to the design of efficient and integrated genomic breeding programs. In this study, we summarised information on 48 sheep and goat breeding programs, genetic and genomic evaluation systems and resources available in 12 countries involved in the SMARTER project. This was done using published reports and surveys distributed to all partners. Responses to the surveys reveals information for more than 9, 16, and 20 dairy goat, dairy sheep, and meat sheep breeds involved in genetic schemes, respectively, with ~3,083,562 animals included in data collection schemes. The main groups of traits recorded across countries are: (1) milk yield and composition, mastitis indicators, udder and body conformation, and reproduction in dairy sheep and dairy goats; and (2) growth, reproduction, health, ultrasound, wool, and carcass in meat sheep. Seven countries have progeny testing schemes, but only 5 use artificial insemination. There are numerous challenges to be addressed (e.g. disparity of trait recording, SNP panels, statistical models used, joining pedigrees across countries as well as grouping breeds based on genetic similarity, and an average of ~30% of animals with unknown sires). However, there are many opportunities to use the current resources and develop collaborative approaches to optimise selection for novel breeding goals such as resilience and efficiency in small ruminants across countries.
653 $aOVINOS
653 $aSHEEP
700 1 $aBERRY, D.
700 1 $aLARROQUE, H.
700 1 $aSCHENKEI, F.S.
700 1 $aCIAPPESONI, G.
700 1 $aO’BRIEN, A.
700 1 $aTORTEREAU, F.
700 1 $aUGARTE, E.
700 1 $aPALHIERE, I.
700 1 $aBAPST, B.
700 1 $aJAKOBSEN, J.
700 1 $aANTONAKOS, G.
700 1 $aKOMINAKIS, A.
700 1 $aCLEMENT, V.
700 1 $aBRUNI, G.
700 1 $aLOYWYCK, V.
700 1 $aMASSENDER, E.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, H.R.
700 1 $aPOSTA, J.
700 1 $aASTRUC, J.M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
